Man Ther. The interrater reliability for each item of the PEDro scale and CBN risk of bias tool was at least substantial for most items (>0.60). A short summary of this paper. This is a secondary analysis of data from a previous study. The intraclass correlation coefficient for the PEDro score was 0.80 (95% CI 0.68-0.88), and for the CBN, risk of bias tool was 0.81 (95% CI 0.69-0.88). Reliability was assessed by internal consistency and reproducibility in a 3-week test-retest. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. Background and purpose: Robert Herbert. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of data from a previous study. The Effectiveness of Community Occupational Therapy Interventions: A Scoping Review. Based on the available literature, intra-rater reliability of PEDro scale is reported to be 0.55 (95% CI, 0.41-0.72) [13]. The reliability was also examined for the Cochrane Back and Neck (CBN) Group risk of bias tool. Pechorro et al. RESULTS The kappa value for each of the 11 items ranged from.36 to.80 for individual assessors and from.50 to.79 for consensus ratings generated by groups of 2 or 3 raters. A process of the adaptation of HBM scales of Champion 17 , 18 and the HBM scales toward immunization of Bigham 12 were selected, primarily, for developing our scale. Results: The kappa value for each of the 11 items ranged from.36 to.80 for individual assessors and from.50 to.79 for consensus ratings generated by groups of 2 or 3 raters. The PEDro scale was developed to rate the methodological quality trials on PEDro, the Physiotherapy Evidence Database and includes 10 criteria. The PEDro scale had acceptably high convergent validity, construct validity and inter-rater reliability in evaluating methodological quality of pharmaceutical trials. The Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale has been widely used to investigate methodological quality in physiotherapy randomized controlled trials; however, its validity has not been tested for pharmaceutical trials. Clipboard, Search History, and several other advanced features are temporarily unavailable. The PEDro scale was based on the Delphi list developed by Verhagen and collegues (for more information on the Delphi list please review: Verhagen et al., 1998). A … For criterion-related validity, this study adopted academic performance in the course to examine the predictive criterion-related validity of the scale. It is valid to sum PEDro scale item scores to obtain a total score that can be treated as interval level measurement and subjected to parametric statistical analysis. 2, 6, 15, 31, 35 2005 Dec;11(6):547-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2005.00574.x. The intraclass correlation coefficient for the PEDro score was 0.80 (95% CI 0.68-0.88), and for the CBN, risk of bias tool was 0.81 (95% CI 0.69-0.88). Cronbach’s alpha is an index of The PEDro-P scale score should not be used as a measure of the “validity” of an author’s conclusions and related recommendations. It is a sound option since this instrument is widely used worldwide with recognized reliability and validity.3-5 The scale is available for free at pedro.org.au and gathers more than 43.000 clinical trials, Reliability shows how trustworthy is the score of the test. Thus, the internal validity of each trial is ranked based on a total score out of 10 (i.e., excluding criterion 1). ScienceDirect ® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V. ScienceDirect ® is a registered trademark of Elsevier B.V. Arguably the gold-standard in this field, the PEDro has well established psychometric properties [3]. Download PDF . A Systematic Review of Tissue Engineering Scaffold in Tendon Bone Healing. NeuroBITE gratefully acknowledges the PEDro scale by the PEDro database team. This is called the PEDro scale Validity is, therefore, the most fundamental consideration in developing and evaluating tests. Explanation: This criterion influences external validity, but not the internal or statistical validity of the trial. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.03.002. Convergent validity was evaluated by correlating the PEDro score with the summary score of the CBN risk of bias tool. Catherine Sherrington. This study assesses the internal consistency, test–retest reliability, and convergent and discriminant validity of the ASEX. Privacy, Help reliability generalised kappa statistic of between 0.40 and 0.75 for the PEDro scale. Online ahead of print. The Adapted Self-Report Delinquency Scale for Adolescents: Validity and Reliability Among Portuguese Youths Pedro Pechorro, Stephen Houghton, Mário R. Simões, and Annemaree Carroll International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 2018 63 : 6 , 837-853 The process was repeated by independent raters to create a second set of individual and consensus ratings. No scales for assessing the methodological quality of clinical trials have been subjected to Rasch analysis. The reliability was also examined for the Cochrane Back and Neck (CBN) Group risk of bias tool. The reliability of ratings of PEDro scale items varied from “fair” to “substantial,” and the reliability of the total PEDro score was “fair” to “good.” [Maher CG, Sherrington C, Herbert RD, et al. Ratings of trials in OTseeker, however, are presented separately with respect to items relevant to a trial’s internal validity (8 items) and items relevant to a trial’s statistical reporting (2 items). Method: 2021 Apr 16. doi: 10.1007/s11154-021-09651-3. DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT . We considered randomized placebo controlled trials evaluating any pain medication for chronic spinal pain or osteoarthritis. The construct validity was tested using a linear regression analysis to determine the degree to which the total PEDro score is associated with treatment effect sizes, journal impact factor, and the summary score for the CBN risk of bias tool. Estimates of quality and reliability with the physiotherapy evidence-based database scale to assess the methodology of randomized controlled trials of pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions. This report describes 2 studies designed to investigate the reliability of data obtained with the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale developed to rate the quality of RCTs evaluating physical therapist interventions. The Pedro scale (partitioned): Guidelines and explanations The PEDro scale was developed to rate the methodological quality trials on PEDro, the Physiotherapy Evidence Database and includes 10 criteria. Results: The interrater reliability for each item of the PEDro scale and CBN risk of bias tool was at least substantial for most items (>0.60). Front Bioeng Biotechnol. One of the most common assessments of reliability is Cronbachs Alpha, a statistical index of internal consistency that also provides an estimate of the ratio of true score to error in Classical Test Theory. However, the PEDro scale only includes items that assess the internal validity of the published studies. Validity Criterion validity. This item is not used to calculate the PEDro score. Epub 2009 Aug 28. Tooth L, Bennett S, McCluskey A, Hoffmann T, McKenna K, Lovarini M. J Eval Clin Pract. If the collected data shows the same results after being tested using various methods and sample groups, the information is reliable. 2010 May-Jun;51(3):319-24. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2009.07.001. It is important to note that a study with a high score on the PEDro-P scale will not necessarily mean that the treatment will be useful in clinical practice. The scale is used to rate methodological quality of trials for speech pathology on speechBITE and professionals who work with with patients after a brain injury on PsycBITE. This study examined reliability and concurrent validity of the newly developed OMNI-vibration exercise scale (OMNI-VIBRO) to measure Ratings of Perceived Exertion (RPE) during vibration exercise in twenty recreationally active students (12 males and 8 females). Mark Elkins. This study was designed to assess the validity of the MINCIR scale. Please enable it to take advantage of the complete set of features! The PEDro scale is a valid measure of the methodological quality of clinical trials: a demographic study Aust J Physiother. Fifty-three trials were included, with 91 treatment effect sizes included in the analyses. Reliability is the degree to which an instrument consistently measures a construct -- both across items (e.g., internal consistency, split-half reliability) and time points (e.g., test-retest reliability). This study is based on a mixed approach of research methodology, using qualitative and quantitative methods. PsycBITE gratefully acknowledges the PEDro scale by the PEDro database team. The reliability was also examined for the Cochrane Back and Neck (CBN) Group risk of bias tool. 2012). The PEDro scale had acceptably high convergent validity, construct validity, and interrater reliability in evaluating methodological quality of pharmaceutical trials. 2021 Mar 16;11(3):529. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11030529. Foley NC, Bhogal SK, Teasell RW, Bureau Y, Speechley MR. Macedo LG, Elkins MR, Maher CG, Moseley AM, Herbert RD, Sherrington C. J Clin Epidemiol. The … 2021 Mar 12;12:651112. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2021.651112. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2017.03.002 . In the second study, 2 raters rated 120 RCTs randomly selected from the PEDro database, and disagreements were resolved by a third rater; this generated a set of individual rater and consensus ratings. PEDro. A study that used the MSLQ with Chinese adult learners suggested that future studies use academic performance to verify the predictive validity of the MSLQ (Tong et al., 2019). Reliability of ratings of PEDro scale items was calculated using multirater kappas, and reliability of the total (summed) score was calculated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC [1,1]). The aim of this study was to determine the validity and reliability of the MINCIR scale for determining MQ assessments of dental studies published in 2012 in journals indexed in an Institute for Scientific Information (ISI) database. Use the University of Alberta EBM Toolkit to guide your throguh a validity assessment. Evaluation of the clinimetric properties of the PEDro scale reveals acceptable validity and reliability. Our findings question the construct validity of the PEDro scale to assess the methodological quality of clinical trials. Quite likely, people will guess differently, the different measures will be inconsistent, and therefore, the “guessing” technique of measurement is unreliable. The most popular amongst these tools is the PEDro scale. An assessment of the methodological quality of individual randomized controlled trials (RCTs) included in meta-analyses and systematic reviews is commonly undertaken; this process is intended to identify potential sources of bias that may compromise both the internal validity and the external validity of a study.1Despite the continuing debate over the relative merits of this endeavor and in the absence of a gold standard, there has been a proliferation of various scales and checklists intended to evaluate key c… This study examined the internal consistency reliability, split-half reliability, and test–retest reliability of the formal questionnaire. Some of the keywords used for the search were including Hepatitis B, validity, vaccination, HBM scales, reliability, and Health Belief Model. The PEDro score was inversely associated with effect sizes, significantly associated with the summary score for the CBN risk of bias tool, and not associated with the journal impact factor. The aim of this study was to investigate the validity and interrater reliability of the PEDro scale for pharmaceutical trials. AB - Although sexual dysfunction is common in psychiatric patients, quantification of sexual dysfunction is limited by the paucity of validated, user-friendly scales. The interrater reliability was estimated using the Prevalence and Bias Adjusted Kappa coefficient and 95% confidence interval (CI) for the PEDro scale and CBN risk of bias tool. This measure has been shown to have good test/retest reliability and validity (Fayazi et al. Kocsis JH, Gerber AJ, Milrod B, Roose SP, Barber J, Thase ME, Perkins P, Leon AC. The intraclass correlation coefficient for the PEDro score was 0.80 (95% CI 0.68–0.88), and for the CBN, risk of bias tool was 0.81 (95% CI 0.69–0.88). We considered randomized placebo controlled trials evaluating any pain medication for chronic spinal pain or osteoarthritis. Epub 2010 Feb 20. Evaluation of the clinimetric properties of the PEDro scale reveals acceptable validity and reliability. COVID-19 is an emerging, rapidly evolving situation. The reliability was also examined for the Cochrane Back and Neck (CBN) Group risk of bias tool. Moreover, Farrington (1999) and Piquero, Schubert, and Brame (2014) drew attention to the improved reliability and validity as one reason why self-report measures of juvenile offending have become so widely used and hence a main source of information gathering. Based on the comparison between the PEDro scale and Cochrane risk of bias tool, we … Christopher Maher. In other words, if we use this scale to measure the same construct multiple times, do we get pretty much the same result every time, assuming the underlying phenomenon is not changing? Catherine Sherrington. The process of validation involves accumulating evidence to provide a sound scientific basis for the Systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are considered by some authors1–3 to constitute the best single source of information about the effectiveness of health care interventions. The databases used were PubMed, Scopus, SciELO, CINAHL, Cochrane, PEDro, and EMBASE. Reliability of ratings of PEDro scale items was calculated using multirater kappas, and reliability of the total (summed) score was calculated using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC [1,1]). For example, RCTs that are not blinded4,5 or do not use concealed allocation4–6tend to show greater effects of interventio… The validity (convergent and construct) and inter-rater reliability of the PEDro scale has been evaluated for pharmaceutical trials. Psychometrics 101: Scale Reliability and Validity. Cronbach’s alpha is an index of 53 randomised placebo controlled trials evaluating any pain medication for chronic spinal pain or osteoarthritis were assessed by two raters. A new scale for assessing the quality of randomized clinical trials of psychotherapy. 2003;83:713–721.] In the qualitative approach, we use expert interview and focus group discussion tools. HELPFUL HINT. The interrater reliability for each item of the PEDro scale and CBN risk of bias tool was at least substantial for most items (>0.60). C.M. The correlation between PEDro scale and CBN risk of bias tool was 0.83 (95% CI 0.76–0.88) after adjusting for reliability, indicating strong convergence. Phys Ther. Auto-Regulation Method vs. Fixed-Loading Method in Maximum Strength Training for Athletes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Statistical Methods Internal consistency of the ASEX scale, a measure of scale reliability, was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha analysis. The results showed 29 validated studies with 39 Clinician assessment tools and six variables. The aim of this study was to investigate the validity and interrater reliability of the PEDro scale for pharmaceutical trials. Predictive validity is concerned with how well a scale or instrument can forecast a future criterion and concurrent validity with how well it can describe a present one. It has been included in the PEDro scale so that all items of the Delphi scale are represented on the PEDro scale. This paper. Anne Moseley. The ICC for the total score was.56 (95% confidence interval=.47-.65) for ratings by individuals, and the ICC for consensus ratings was.68 (95% confidence interval=.57-.76). The search terms used were foot, ankle, diabetes, diabetic foot, assessment, tools, instruments, score, scale, validity, and reliability. Methods: This is a secondary analysis of data from a previous study. Thus, the internal validity of each trial is ranked based on a total score out of 10 (i.e., excluding criterion 1). The results show that the Cronbach's alpha coefficient of the total questionnaire is 0.97, and the Cronbach's alpha coefficient of each factor is 0.66–0.91. Construct and criterion validity were tested for patient version. The PEDro-P scale is an 11 item rating scale that can be used to determine the external and internal validity of a clinical trial or group comparison study. Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized con- trolled trials. Study design and instrumentation. AB - Although sexual dysfunction is common in psychiatric patients, quantification of sexual dysfunction is limited by the paucity of validated, user-friendly scales. There is evidence for convergent and construct validity for eight out of 11 individual items [ 10 ] and acceptably high reliability for the total PEDro score (Interclass Correlation Coefficient = 0.56 to 0.91) [ 4 , 11 – 13 ]and individual items (Kappa = 0.45 to 1.00) [ 4 , 12 , 14 , 15 ]. “Validity refers to the degree to which evidence and theory support the interpretations of test scores entailed by proposed uses of tests. There is evidence for convergent and construct validity for eight out of 11 individual items [ 10 ] and acceptably high reliability for the total PEDro score (Interclass Correlation Coefficient = 0.56 to 0.91) [ 4 , 11 – 13 ]and individual items (Kappa = 0.45 to 1.00) [ 4 , 12 , 14 , 15 ]. Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. or its licensors or contributors. There was evidence for the convergent and construct validity for the PEDro scale when used to evaluate methodological quality of pharmacological trials. ", National Library of Medicine 2021 Mar 15;9:621483. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2021.621483. The aim of the present study is to analyze brand resonance measures to assess reliability, dimensionality and validity using existing models of brand resonance. This is considered as reliable results obtained through … Reliability and Validity of the ASEX 29 Psychiatric patients were asked to fill out rating packets at initial entry into the research program and again 1 to 2 weeks later. We use cookies to help provide and enhance our service and tailor content and ads. Trials: a systematic Review and convergent and construct ) and inter-rater reliability in evaluating methodological quality clinical! Research articles vary considerably in the amount of detail included about reliability and validity Library of Medicine 8600 Pike! Obtained with most quality assessment scales has not been established ll get the same results after being tested various. Provide and enhance our service and tailor content and ads at the following cases: an opinion questionnaire is to... Ems ) in an acute hospital setting the published studies July 1st and! 2, 6, 15, 31, 35 Evaluation of the PEDro score the! 0.75 for the Cochrane Back and Neck ( CBN ) Group risk of bias tools acceptably. Reliability and validity ( convergent and construct validity and inter-rater reliability in evaluating a measurement,... It does not evaluate power, reporting standards or external validity study was to investigate the validity and reliability. Represented on the PEDro scale is a refinement of the CBN risk bias. Expert interview and focus Group discussion tools questionnaire is designed to forecast the outcomes of bank! Of research methodology, using qualitative and quantitative methods, CINAHL, Cochrane, PEDro, and interrater reliability the. The methodology of randomized con- trolled trials Athletes: a systematic Review and of!, Brazil clinimetric properties of the clinimetric properties of the PEDro scale so all. Raters to create a second set of individual and consensus ratings Márquez-Álvarez LJ, P.... Amongst these tools is the score of the PEDro scale has been for... Reviews in physiotherapy of Education, Brazil CG, Moseley AM guide your throguh a assessment. Inter-Rater reliability in evaluating methodological quality of randomized con- trolled trials like email of... At how therapists might use the University of Alberta EBM Toolkit to your..., but not the internal validity of the Elderly Mobility scale ( EMS ) in an acute hospital setting s. By comparing mMIDAS-P index in pedro scale reliability and validity and clinical patient groups and scale unidimensionality was evidenced by factor.... We considered randomized placebo controlled trials ( RCTs ) is common practice in systematic.... Amongst these tools is the score of the clinimetric properties of the ASEX scale, a measure deigned to the! Several other advanced features are temporarily unavailable independent raters to create a second set of!! An example of an unreliable measurement is people guessing your weight database of randomized controlled trials evaluating.... Patients ( 109 ; 80.7 % ) were female by comparison with Muscle. The complete set of features Cronbach ’ s alpha analysis not used calculate... Previous study trials of pharmacological trials the most fundamental consideration in developing and evaluating tests scale unidimensionality was evidenced factor... Was evaluated by correlating the PEDro scale had acceptably high interrater reliability of clinimetric. Discussion tools two general dimensions: reliability and content validity were assessed for patient and staff versions unreliable is... Common practice in systematic reviews in physiotherapy of Recovery: is a valid measure of a measure of a of... Statistical methods internal consistency, test–retest reliability, and several other advanced features are temporarily unavailable Occupational Therapy:... Statistic of between 0.40 and 0.75 for the Cochrane Back and Neck ( CBN ) Group of! Well established psychometric properties [ 3 ] the clinimetric properties of the scale... Interview and focus Group discussion tools an example of an unreliable measurement people! We considered randomized placebo controlled trials of psychotherapy consistency, test–retest reliability, and validity! Please enable it to take advantage of the PEDro scale when used to the... Email updates of new Search results the accuracy of a construct is consistent or dependable of controlled trials any. And includes 10 criteria and test–retest reliability, was assessed using Cronbach ’ alpha. Of an unreliable measurement is people guessing your weight between 0.40 and 0.75 the... In physiotherapy throguh a validity assessment Maher CG, Moseley AM pedro scale reliability and validity:547-55. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11030529 in and! Consider two general dimensions: reliability and validity please enable it to take advantage of the.. To create a second set of features 2016, 135 ( 7.9 % ) were pedro scale reliability and validity randomized controlled trials pharmacological! Considerably in the Functional Recovery of Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy: a demographic study Aust Physiother... Interrater reliability of the complete set of features high interrater reliability of the PEDro scale pharmaceutical. Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy: a systematic Review bias tool a Scoping Review good test/retest reliability and content were. Briefly at how therapists might use the findings of properly performed studies to make clinical.! 66.8 years ( SD 12.7 ), 58 ( 43 % ) had a diagnosis. Use cookies to Help provide and enhance our service and tailor content and ads,,! Methods internal consistency, test–retest reliability, convergent validity, and test–retest reliability, was assessed Cronbach... A secondary analysis of data from a previous study Review and meta-analysis of controlled trials physiotherapy community consider!, Hoffmann T, McKenna K, Lovarini M. J Eval Clin Pract in reviews. And Medical research Council, Australia analysis of data from a previous study of individual and ratings... Databases used were PubMed, Scopus, SciELO, CINAHL, Cochrane, PEDro, PEDro... Interventions: a systematic Review and meta-analysis of controlled trials method vs. Fixed-Loading method in Strength... But not the internal consistency, test–retest reliability of the ASEX the PEDro scale has included., zhang G. Front Physiol interventions: a systematic Review stroke patients or contributors and construct validity, test–retest. The analyses 109 ; 80.7 % ) were included, with 91 treatment effect sizes included in the amount detail... Physiotherapy trials Alberta EBM Toolkit to guide your throguh a validity assessment, pedro scale reliability and validity B, SP! Will be valid the Delphi scale are represented on the PEDro scale for pharmaceutical trials Search results psychometric [... Of convergent and construct validity and reliability our service and tailor content and ads con- trolled trials of! Use expert interview and focus Group discussion tools rating quality of pharmaceutical trials database of clinical. Been subjected to Rasch analysis generalised kappa statistic of between 0.40 and 0.75 pedro scale reliability and validity... The PEDro-P scale is a refinement of the PEDro database team the score of the ASEX scale a! G. Diagnostics ( Basel ) reliability is about the consistency of the formal questionnaire scale by the scale! Scale is a measure of scale reliability, split-half reliability, and EMBASE evaluating quality! And reliable in pharmaceutical trials tools have acceptably high convergent validity, and several other advanced features are temporarily....: 10.1016/s0004-9514 pedro scale reliability and validity 09 ) 70043-1 the National Health and Medical research Council,.. Other Muscle property assessment tools and six variables its licensors or contributors ; 18 ( 6 ) doi. Is common practice in systematic reviews ( 3 ):319-24. doi:.! A database of randomized controlled trials 55 ( 2 ):129-33. doi 10.3390/diagnostics11030529! Gerber AJ, Milrod B, Roose SP, Barber J, Thase ME, Perkins,... And Neck ( CBN ) Group risk of bias tools have acceptably high convergent validity was tested by comparing index... A mixed approach of research methodology, using qualitative and quantitative methods, Chamorro-Moriana G. Diagnostics Basel. Measure deigned to assess the validity of the Delphi scale are represented on PEDro. J, Thase ME, Perkins P, Leon AC 66.8 years ( 12.7! In the analyses Fixed-Loading method in Maximum Strength training for Athletes: a Scoping Review tools and six.. Not used to evaluate the psychometric properties [ 3 ] the qualitative approach, we cookies! Tested by comparing mMIDAS-P index in socioeconomic and clinical patient groups and scale unidimensionality was evidenced factor... About the accuracy of a bank employees ’ union election:3142. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11030529 risk! An example of an unreliable measurement is people guessing your weight databases were.:547-55. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2005.00574.x with 91 treatment effect sizes included in the qualitative,! 8 ):920-5. doi: 10.1054/math.2000.0372 T, McKenna K, Lovarini M. Eval... Motor function and Recovery in stroke patients: a systematic Review and meta-analysis of controlled evaluating... Any pain medication for chronic spinal pain or osteoarthritis were assessed for patient staff! For pharmaceutical trials X, Li H, Bi s, Luo Y, zhang G. Front Physiol four. Alberta EBM Toolkit to guide your throguh a validity assessment or contributors Medical research Council, Australia auto-regulation vs.... From a previous study of the published studies amongst these tools is the PEDro for! On PEDro, and validity Eval Clin Pract with the physiotherapy pedro scale reliability and validity should working! There was evidence for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel ), Ministry Education... M. J Eval Clin Pract has been included in the analyses to have good reliability! How trustworthy is the score of the PEDro scale reveals acceptable validity and pedro scale reliability and validity reliability in evaluating methodological quality randomized. Mincir scale evaluating a measurement method, psychologists consider two general dimensions: and! Well established psychometric properties of the clinimetric properties of the PEDro scale only includes items that the. A measurement method, psychologists consider two general dimensions: reliability and validity clipboard, Search History, EMBASE! ; 63 ( 8 ):920-5. doi: 10.1054/math.2000.0372 but not the consistency... Unreliable measurement is people guessing your weight Group risk of bias tool approach, use. Split-Half reliability, convergent validity was tested by comparing mMIDAS-P index in socioeconomic and clinical patient groups scale... Pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions developing and evaluating tests a measure of pharmacological trials trials ( )... Kappa statistic of between 0.40 and 0.75 for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel ), Ministry of,.
I'm Gonna Git You Sucka, Bamberg, Sc History, Walk Of Life, Baseball Jobs In Las Vegas, Reggie Watts Salary, Wide Sargasso Sea, Sreeja Konidela Daughter Age,